The maintained alternatives to Flowise are Dify, n8n and Langflow — and the reason to move is that the Flowise repository is archived and read-only, not that the software stopped running. Both halves of that sentence matter, because the wind-down did not shut everything down at once: the open-source project is finished, the published packages still install without a warning, and the hosted Cloud is still publishing prices with no end date attached. Which of those three facts applies to you decides whether this is an urgent migration or a planned one.
Two name collisions to clear first. flowise.io is a different company entirely — a work-management consultancy — so any pricing you find there describes that business. And Langflow is not Flowise: near-identical name, similar canvas, completely different ownership, licence and hosting story. Do not carry a fact from one to the other.
What actually shut down, and what did not
The vendor published a milestone table on its sunset page, and the stated reason is worth quoting rather than paraphrasing: "developers are increasingly relying on new coding agents such as Claude Code/OpenClaw to handle complex tasks. The typical rigid workflow low code approach quickly hits the limit when it comes to complexity." The milestones are July 29, 2026 for announcement and code freeze, repository archival in August, and August 31, 2026 for end of life of official core-team presence.
The archival date disagrees between two official sources. The sunset table says August 10, 2026; the "The Future of Flowise" announcement thread and the repository's own final push are both dated August 13, 2026. Use August 13 for your own records and note that the vendor page says otherwise.
| Component | State on September 19, 2026 | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| FlowiseAI/Flowise repository | Archived and read-only; final push August 13, 2026. The README now opens "Flowise has been archived" | No upstream patch will ever ship again, security included |
| Final release | flowise@3.1.4, July 29, 2026 | Pin it explicitly; nothing later exists |
| npm package | Still installable. The registry serves 3.1.4 and 0 of 104 published versions carry a deprecation flag | The announced deprecation was not applied — an install prints no deprecation warning |
| Docker image | Docker Hub still reports the repository as active; newest tag 3.1.4 | Same gap: docker pull succeeds silently |
| Embedded chat widget | flowise-embed is not deprecated and the jsDelivr CDN still serves it | Existing embeds keep rendering; the widget's repository FlowiseChatEmbed is archived too |
| Flowise Cloud | Free, $35 and $65 tiers still published on the homepage, sign-up links resolving | No end-of-service date, export deadline or refund term is published anywhere |
| docs.flowiseai.com | Live, but the docs repository FlowiseDocs is archived | Treat it as a snapshot of a frozen product, not a maintained manual |
One licence correction before anyone forks. The announcement says "the Apache 2.0 licensed code is yours to keep building on", but LICENSE.md carves out everything under packages/server/src/enterprise and files carrying an explicit copyright notice, which sit under a commercial licence requiring a valid Enterprise subscription for production use and forbidding redistribution. A fork is Apache 2.0 minus that directory, from a vendor that is winding down. No successor has surfaced under the project's own name: a GitHub repository search restricted to repositories with "flowise" in the name, pushed since August 20, 2026, turns up nothing above one star. A fork renamed to something else would not appear in that search, so read it as "no obvious successor", not as proof there is none.
Which alternative fits which Flowise workflow
Pick by the shape of what you already built, not by star count. All three below were checked on September 19, 2026 and all three are active, with pushes on September 18.
| If your Flowise build was… | Move to | Status and latest release | Licence to read before you commit |
|---|---|---|---|
| A knowledge chatbot over uploaded documents, with retrieval | Dify | Active, 156,340 stars; release 1.17.1, September 10, 2026 | Modified Apache 2.0: no operating a multi-tenant service, no removing the console logo or copyright |
| Mostly app-to-app automation with a few LLM steps | n8n | Active, 205,277 stars; release 2.39.8, September 18, 2026 | Sustainable Use License, not open source. Files with .ee. need an Enterprise Licence; non-master branches are unlicensed |
| A component-level graph closest to the Flowise canvas | Langflow | Active, 154,985 stars; release v1.12.2, September 16, 2026 | MIT, the least restrictive of the three |
Langflow carries its own warning, and it is the same warning Flowise just delivered. It was acquired by DataStax in April 2024, IBM announced its intent to acquire DataStax in February 2025, and the hosted offering is already gone — a DataStax release note dated April 9, 2026 reads "Removed DataStax Langflow from Astra. As an alternative, you can use Langflow OSS." Today Langflow installs as a desktop app, Docker image, Python package or from source, and its site navigation has no pricing page. Choose it for the MIT-licensed code you will host yourself, not for a vendor to buy hosting from.
What migrates, what does not, and how to back out
Flowise's exporter source defines exactly fifteen record types: agent flows (both generations), four assistant kinds, chat flows, chat messages, message feedback, custom templates, document stores, document-store file chunks, executions, tools and variables. The routes expose export, import and chatflow-messages as permission-gated POST endpoints, so a whole-workspace dump can be scripted rather than clicked.
Three boundaries decide how long this takes.
- Credentials do not move. The official cloud-migration guide says so directly — "Credentials are not exported. You will have to create new credentials and use those in the flows and assistants" — and the exporter confirms it: the word credential appears zero times in that file. Every key, database password and OAuth token gets re-entered by hand.
- IDs survive, URLs change. The same guide notes that exported IDs stay the same, so an application calling a flow by ID only needs its base URL updated. That is the one thing that makes a Flowise-to-Flowise move cheap — and it buys you nothing moving to a different product.
- Nothing in those three repositories reads the format. A GitHub code search across
langgenius/dify,n8n-io/n8nandlangflow-ai/langflowreturns zero hits for "flowise" in any of them, so none of the three ships an importer or converter. That search covers the indexed default branch, not third-party plugins. Use the export as a written specification and rebuild each flow.
Before any of that, snapshot the state. On a default self-hosted install the database is SQLite at ~/.flowise and blob storage at ~/.flowise/storage, per the environment-variable reference — but the credential encryption key lives outside the database, and without it those credentials are gone for good.
# Default self-hosted layout: the SQLite database and the blob storage
# folder both live under one directory. Snapshot it before you touch anything.
cp -a ~/.flowise ~/flowise-backup-$(date +%F)
# The encryption key is NOT inside that database. If it does not travel with
# the data, every stored credential is unrecoverable.
# SECRETKEY_STORAGE_TYPE local | aws
# SECRETKEY_PATH default: Flowise/packages/server
# FLOWISE_SECRETKEY_OVERWRITE replaces the file-based key entirely
# Pin the final release rather than tracking a floating tag, so a future
# registry change cannot move the image under you.
docker pull flowiseai/flowise:3.1.4Rollback is then simple, which is the point of doing it first: keep the old stack cold rather than deleted until the replacement has run your real traffic for a full billing cycle, and rotate the keys the old stack held only after you decommission it.
What the replacements cost, and where the money actually goes
Two caveats on this table. Dify and n8n render only their annual-billing figures server-side; their monthly toggles are client-side and those numbers were not captured, so do not derive a monthly price from these. And the Flowise Cloud row is here to describe the market, not as a purchase recommendation — it is a priced tier on a site whose own banner announces a sunset.
| Platform | Published price | What that price includes |
|---|---|---|
| Flowise Cloud Free / Starter / Pro | $0 / $35 / $65 per month | 100 / 10,000 / 50,000 predictions per month and 5MB / 1GB / 10GB storage; Pro adds 5 users at $15 per extra user. No end-of-service date published |
| Flowise self-hosted | Free software | Your compute and storage, plus security maintenance that now has no upstream |
| Dify Sandbox | Free | 200 message credits, 1 workspace, 1 member, 5 apps, 50 knowledge documents. The page notes credits can be replaced with your own API key |
| Dify Professional / Team | $590 / $1,590 per year | 5,000 / 10,000 message credits a month, 3 / 50 members, 50 / 200 apps, 500 / 1,000 knowledge documents. Taxes excluded |
| n8n Starter / Pro / Business | 20€ / 50€ / 667€ per month, billed annually | 2.5K / 10K / 40K workflow executions with unlimited steps and unlimited users; Business adds SSO, SAML and LDAP and Git version control |
| n8n Community Edition | Free self-hosted | The standard self-hosted build, under the Sustainable Use License |
| Langflow | Free, MIT | No paid tier exists; you pay only for your own infrastructure and model tokens |
Every one of those prices buys the builder. The model tokens are billed separately at whichever endpoint you point it at, and at real volume they dominate. Take the Starter tier's own published quota as the anchor: 10,000 answers in a month, each assumed to send 8,000 input tokens of prompt plus retrieved context and return 600 output tokens. Those assumptions are illustrative, not measured; rates are live Kunavo catalog prices per million tokens.
| Model | Input / output per 1M | Estimated model spend for the month | Per answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | $0.40 / $2.00 | $44.00 | $0.0044 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $0.525 / $2.625 | $57.75 | $0.0058 |
| GPT-5.6 Terra | $0.70 / $4.20 | $81.20 | $0.0081 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | $1.20 / $6.00 | $132.00 | $0.0132 |
This is token arithmetic, not a measured task cost and not a bill ceiling. The reading that matters: under these assumptions the model line runs from roughly $44 to $132 a month against a $35 platform subscription, so "which builder is cheapest" is rarely the first question to answer. Model choice and prompt size move the bill by more than the platform does. One more line to budget separately: a retrieval app also embeds documents at ingest and queries at read, and Kunavo does not serve an embedding model — that step runs locally or against an outside provider and is billed there, not here.
Kunavo's catalog amount is a billing floor rather than a cap: when the upstream reports its charge, the bill is the greater of catalog cost and upstream cost times the applicable markup. The minimum top-up is $10 in prepaid credit, which is a funding minimum rather than a task fee or a subscription — see billing details. Once you have chosen a builder, create a Kunavo account and follow the chat-completions reference for the base URL and key format. For the general pattern all three builders use, see OpenAI-compatible API; for the retrieval side, RAG implementation.
If you are staying on Flowise for now, fix the model list first
Flowise's OpenAI-compatible route is still there in the final release, and in source it carries no licence or plan check: the ChatOpenAI node ships in the Apache 2.0 packages/components tree, outside the packages/server/src/enterprise carve-out. On the ChatOpenAI node, open Additional Parameters and set Base Path (field name basepath, described as an override for the default base URL) and optionally Base Options, a JSON object of default headers. In the node source those map straight onto the client as baseURL and defaultHeaders. The API key is an ordinary ChatOpenAI credential.
The trap is the model name. On the plain ChatOpenAI node it is an async options field loaded by a listModels method that reads a models.json file — never your endpoint's own GET /v1/models. The default source is a raw file on the archived repository's main branch, so that dropdown is now frozen permanently: read on September 19, 2026 it tops out at claude-opus-4-7 for Anthropic and gpt-5.5 for OpenAI, and it will never gain a newer name. Setting Base Path alone leaves you choosing from a list that stopped moving in August.
Two documented ways out. Use the separate ChatOpenAI Custom node, whose Model Name is a free-text string field and which carries the same Base Path and Base Options; or set MODEL_LIST_CONFIG_JSON to your own file or URL, which replaces the dropdown source globally.
{
"chat": [
{
"name": "chatOpenAI",
"models": [
{
"label": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
"name": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
"input_cost": 0.0000012000,
"output_cost": 0.0000060000
},
{
"label": "claude-haiku-4-5",
"name": "claude-haiku-4-5",
"input_cost": 0.0000004000,
"output_cost": 0.0000020000
}
]
}
]
}Three boundaries on that route, all read from source on September 19, 2026. The Custom node calls a deny-list check against the base path, and the default deny list blocks, among others, localhost, 127.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 169.254.0.0/16, ::1 and fc00::/7 with "Access to this host is denied by policy" — a public HTTPS endpoint is unaffected, a proxy on localhost or a LAN address is not, and HTTP_SECURITY_CHECK and HTTP_DENY_LIST control it. The plain ChatOpenAI node does not run that check. And the Anthropic-Messages protocol has no base-URL field on the node that speaks it: the chat-model node directory contains one Anthropic-Messages node, ChatAnthropic, and its source declares no base-URL, base-path or API-URL input. So through that node an Anthropic-Messages endpoint is not addressable, and it has to be consumed through the OpenAI-compatible route instead — see the Anthropic base URL doc for where that protocol is available. One documentation quirk while you are reading: the official page titled "ChatOpenAI" is served from a URL slug containing "azure", and it is the canonical Base Path reference for the plain node, not Azure documentation.
A caveat on all of the above, stated the same way the AI agent API directory states it: Kunavo has not runtime-tested Flowise, Dify, n8n or Langflow against its endpoint. Every configuration claim here is transcribed from vendor documentation and repository source, not measured end to end. Keep a working route available, run one bounded task, and read the charge your own account recorded for it.
A staged cutover that you can reverse
- Snapshot the data directory and the encryption key, as above, and pin the image to
3.1.4. - Export every workspace now, while the instance is up. If Cloud is your deployment, do this first — no export deadline is published, which is not the same as there being none.
- Write down every credential and what it is for, before you rotate anything. None of them comes across.
- Rebuild one representative flow by hand in the target, and only one. That is where you learn what the target cannot express.
- Run both stacks on the same inputs and diff the outputs for a period you choose in advance.
- Cut traffic over. Keep the old stack cold, not deleted, for one full billing cycle.
- Decommission, then rotate the keys the old stack held.
If the conclusion of step 4 is that you do not need a visual builder at all — which is the reason the vendor itself gave for winding down — then the comparison worth reading is AI gateway and AI cost optimization rather than another canvas.
FAQ
Is Flowise dead?
The open-source project is finished; the company's hosted service is not visibly finished. FlowiseAI announced a wind-down with three milestones: July 29, 2026 announcement and code freeze, with no further pull requests reviewed or accepted; repository archival in August 2026; and August 31, 2026 as end of life for official core-team presence in Discord and GitHub. The repository is read-only and its README now opens with the archive notice. But every milestone in that table sits under a column headed “Impact on OSS Repository”, and as of September 19, 2026 the flowiseai.com homepage still publishes Free, $35 and $65 Cloud tiers with working sign-up links. No end-of-service date for Cloud is published anywhere.
What is the best Flowise alternative?
It depends on which part of Flowise you were using. For a knowledge chatbot with document ingestion and retrieval, Dify is the closest maintained equivalent — active, shipping releases, modified Apache 2.0 with a no-multi-tenant and no-logo-removal carve-out. For flows that mostly glue SaaS apps together with a few LLM steps, n8n is the better shape. Do not decide on custom-endpoint support, because it does not separate them: read on September 21, 2026, all three ship an Anthropic credential or component carrying its own base-URL field — n8n's AnthropicApi credential has a “Base URL” defaulting to https://api.anthropic.com, Dify's Anthropic provider takes an optional “API URL”, and Langflow's Anthropic component takes an “Anthropic API URL” — alongside an OpenAI-compatible route in each. For a component-level canvas closest to Flowise's own, Langflow is MIT-licensed and active — but self-hosting only, because its hosted service was removed from DataStax Astra in April 2026.
Can I still install and run Flowise after the archive?
Yes, and with no warning at all, which is the part worth knowing. The announcement said npm packages and Docker images would be marked deprecated on archival day. Checked September 19, 2026: the npm registry serves flowise 3.1.4, published July 29, 2026, and zero of its 104 published versions carry a deprecation flag; Docker Hub still reports the flowiseai/flowise repository as active. So `npm install -g flowise` and `docker pull flowiseai/flowise` both still resolve against a live, undeprecated artifact. What you lose is the upstream channel for a future security patch, not the ability to start the software.
Is Flowise Cloud shutting down?
No shutdown date has been published, and that gap is the risk rather than a reassurance. The sunset page scopes all three milestones to the OSS repository and says nothing about Cloud accounts, data export, refunds or whether signups are closed. The Terms of Service at flowiseai.com/terms are marked last updated June 3, 2024, state no notice period and no refund policy for prepaid subscriptions, and say that “Upon termination, your access may be revoked, and data may be deleted in accordance with our retention policy.” Export your workspaces now and treat any new subscription as a decision made without a published end date.
Can I import my Flowise flows into Dify, n8n or Langflow?
No. A code search across langgenius/dify, n8n-io/n8n and langflow-ai/langflow on September 19, 2026 returns zero matches for the string “flowise” in any of them, so none of the three ships an importer or a converter; that search covers each repository's indexed default branch, not third-party plugins. Flowise's own export produces fifteen record types, including chat flows, agent flows, tools, variables and document stores, and none of the three targets reads that format. Plan on rebuilding each flow by hand and use the export as a specification you read from, not a file you load.
Do my credentials come across when I export Flowise?
No, and this is the single most expensive surprise in a Flowise migration. The official cloud-migration guide states plainly that credentials are not exported and that you will have to create new ones and use those in the flows and assistants. The exporter's source confirms it: the exported record types list contains no credential entry, and the word does not appear in the file. On a self-hosted instance the credentials are encrypted with a key held outside the database, so the key has to travel with the data or they are unrecoverable. Inventory every credential and what it is for before you start.
Can I keep using Flowise with newer models?
Only by bypassing the dropdown. On the plain ChatOpenAI node the model name is an async options list loaded from a models.json file, and the default source is a raw file on the archived repository's main branch — frozen, as of September 19, 2026, with Anthropic names topping out at claude-opus-4-7 and OpenAI names at gpt-5.5. It will never gain a newer entry. Two documented ways out: use the separate ChatOpenAI Custom node, whose model name is a free-text string field, or set the MODEL_LIST_CONFIG_JSON environment variable to your own models.json. Base Path on either node sets the endpoint; the Anthropic node exposes no base-URL field at all.
Is there a maintained Flowise fork?
Not one with any traction. A GitHub repository search for repositories named “flowise” pushed since August 20, 2026, sorted by stars, returns nothing above one star — the top hit is a security proof-of-concept, and the rest are personal clones, coursework and a third-party SDK. That search only covered repositories whose name contains “flowise”, so a fork under a different name would not appear in it. Before adopting any fork, read the licence: the code is Apache 2.0 except for packages/server/src/enterprise and files with explicit copyright notices, which are under a commercial licence that requires a paid subscription for production use and forbids redistribution.
Read directly for this page on September 19, 2026: the Flowise README, models.json, LICENSE.md, the ChatOpenAI, ChatOpenAI Custom and ChatAnthropic node sources, the export-import service source, the npm registry document, the Docker Hub repository document, flowiseai.com and flowiseai.com/sunset. Re-checked on September 21, 2026: the archive flag and final-push date, the announcement thread, the Dify, n8n and Langflow repository status, releases and licences, the Dify and n8n pricing pages, the DataStax Astra release note, the Flowise Terms of Service, and the Anthropic credential or component definitions in n8n, Dify and Langflow. Star counts were read on September 19 and move daily. Kunavo token rates are read from the live catalog, and every dollar figure in the worked example is illustrative token arithmetic.